Challenges of the Intermittent Employment Contract in Brazil: Statistical Analysis and Legislative Gaps
Keywords:
Intermittent Work, Labor Reform, Comparative Law, PrecariousnessAbstract
The article examines the implementation of the intermittent employment contract in Brazil eight years after the Labor Reform. Through a statistical analysis of CAGED data and a comparative study with the legislations of Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the UK, the author points out the legislative gaps in Law No. 13,467/2017. Issues such as minimum income guarantee, the unpredictability of calls, and the need for regulation to avoid extreme precariousness are discussed, despite the STF's declaration of constitutionality. (Received: August 2025 | Accepted: September 2025).
References
BRASIL. Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego. Dados do Cadastro Geral de Empregados e Desempregados (CAGED). Brasília, DF, 2024.
BROLIO, Raphael Jacob. Contrato de Trabalho Intermitente. São Paulo: LTr, 2019.
SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. ADI 5826, ADI 5829 e ADI 6154. Relator: Min. Edson Fachin. Redator para o acórdão: Min. Alexandre de Moraes. Brasília, DF, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data are available within the body of the article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raphael Jacob Brolio (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content. The license used is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
