Memory, person recognition, and the CNJ Resolution 484
Keywords:
Criminal Procedure, Recognition, Constitutional Guarantees, MemoryAbstract
The present work analyzes the importance of formalities in the recognition of persons in Brazilian criminal procedure law, highlighting the transition from the inquisitorial to the accusatory system. The article discusses the fallibility of human memory, system and estimator variables, and how the CNJ Resolution 484/2022 establishes guidelines to minimize judicial errors and guarantee constitutional rights in the recognition of suspects.
Received in: July 2024 | Accepted in: September 2024
References
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. Direito Constitucional Contemporâneo: os direitos fundamentais na Constituição de 1988. 10. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Jur, 2022.
DA ROSA, Alexandre Morais. Guia do Processo Penal: conforme a teoria dos jogos. 7. ed. Florianópolis: EMais, 2021.
INNOCENCE PROJECT BRASIL. Prova de Reconhecimento e Erro Judiciário. São Paulo: Innocence Project Brasil, 2020.
LOPES JR., Aury. Direito Processual Penal. 18. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2021.
LIMA, Renato Brasileiro de. Manual de Processo Penal: volume único. 8. ed. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2020.
SRIDHAR, Sruthi et al. Cognitive neuroscience perspective on memory: overview and summary. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, v. 17, 25 jul. 2023.
STRECK, Lenio Luiz; DE OLIVEIRA, Rafael Tomaz. O que é isto as garantias processuais penais? 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data are available within the body of the article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alex Tincani Pacheco (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content. The license used is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).











