ADPF 1.066
The unconstitutionality of municipal exemption from legal fees in the Special Tax Regularization Program (PERT)
Keywords:
Success Fees, Public Advocacy, Tax Regularization, Legislative CompetenceAbstract
The article analyzes the judgment of ADPF 1,066 by the STF, which declared unconstitutional a municipal rule from Belo Horizonte that exempted the payment of success fees for those joining PERT. The decision is based on the exclusive competence of the Union to legislate on procedural law and the alimentary nature of the legal fees, reinforcing the autonomy of public advocacy and the protection of the public interest against the undue waiver of funds intended to strengthen the career.
Received: September 2025 | Accepted: October 2025
References
BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal.
BRASIL. [Código de Processo Civil (2015)]. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Brasília, DF.
STF. Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 1.066 Minas Gerais. Relator: Min. Nunes Marques. Julgamento: [2024].
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data are available within the body of the article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 José Luiz Souza de Moraes (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content. The license used is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).











