Legal Proceduralization Techniques in Biolaw and Complex Responses to Scientific and Ethical Development in the 21st Century
Keywords:
Biolaw, Proceduralization, BioethicsAbstract
Faced with the insufficiency of positivist legal techniques for legal decision-making and nomogenesis, this article studies the application of judicial proceduralization techniques in bioethical analysis situations. Based on the study of real factual situations, it seeks to demonstrate the importance of basing on fundamental rights and the use of proceduralization techniques to achieve appropriate responses in situations of absence of law, allowing Law to offer solutions to conflicts arising from scientific and technological development.
Received: September 2023 | Accepted: December 2023
References
ALEXY, Robert. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais. Tradução de Virgílio Afonso da Silva. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2008.
BEAUCHAMP, Tom L.; CHILDRESS, James F. Princípios de ética biomédica. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
DINAMARCO, Cândido Rangel. A instrumentalidade do processo. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2008.
FÜRST, Henderson. Bioética e direitos fundamentais. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2022.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Faticidade e validade: sobre o direito e o estado democrático de direito em termos de teoria do discurso. Tradução de Menalcere Guedes e Castro e Clélia Aparecida Martins. São Paulo: UNESP, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data are available within the body of the article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Henderson Fürst de Oliveira (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content. The license used is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
